PVcase Above Webinar FAQs
The PVcase and Above webinar addressed advancing utility-scale solar design using aerial topographic mapping, highlighting that drone photogrammetry offers vastly superior granularity with elevation points every three centimeters compared to traditional ground surveying, and discussed challenges such as vegetation impact on accuracy and the use of LIDAR drones for detailed point cloud data.
We were pleased to meet and hear you in our joint seminar with Above, the solar PV drone inspection and software solutions company. During the webinar, we did a deep dive into the topic: How to advance utility-scale solar design in PVcase using aerial topographic mapping. It was encouraging to see your enthusiasm and answer many on-point questions. Below we provide answers to the most popular questions in our post-seminar FAQ.
Question: Can you briefly highlight the accuracy and granularity comparison?
Adrien Van den Abeele (Above): The accuracy of measurement is based on the accuracy of a single point. It doesn’t explain how many points you get over a specific area. If ground surveyors say that they have the most accurate measurements down to one nanometer, but they have a single point on a hundred-hectare site, that wouldn’t be very useful. That would be great accuracy but extremely poor granularity.
Ground surveyors usually measure accuracy by measuring points in the grid, usually situated from 5 to 20 meters from each other. So ground surveying has good accuracy because you have a person having to walk in a field taking measurements, but the time they spend on-site massively influences the cost. And the granularity suffers from it.
Granularity gives you how many points the site has. It uses the methodology of photogrammetry, which employs drones to measure points in the field every three centimeters. The beauty of drone data is that the drone captures the entire 3D model of your site. So you have elevation points for every three centimeters, and therefore granularity is immense and gives you far greater overall accuracy of your site.
Question: We have been developing more projects on abandoned lands, and sometimes we have a lot of vegetation. What is its impact on accuracy? Do we need to perform civil works (like clearing sites) before doing an aerial topographic mapping? Does Above also use LIDAR drones for point clouds?
Adrien Van den Abeele (Above): The beauty of photogrammetry is that it can capture a lot of data on the ground. If you have sparse vegetation, it gives you sufficient data about your site. We can also offer a combination of aerial mapping to cover the large extent of the area, localized ground surveying, or LIDAR data for areas with very dense vegetation. However, photogrammetry alone can give you a lot of data.
The photogrammetry will detect the real ground based on the flight and the different angles. The principle of photogrammetry is that it captures many views of the same area from different angles. And with those points, you can determine what is the real ground by using elevation points. Then they separate between ground and different levels of vegetation, e.g., low vegetation, trees, and the rest.
When we use photogrammetry for sparse vegetation in abandoned lands, the drone will manage to get raw data from the ground. Then we process the data from the digital service model so that the digital terrain model would have all the ground elevation. We usually use LIDAR for specific projects, but we rely on photogrammetry 95% of the time. Regarding solar, LIDAR is still too expensive and doesn’t go through deep foliage, forested areas, or crops. Hence, photogrammetry is a perfect solution for solar development.
Question: How does the new functionality “Import terrain” work?
Joseph Ziliukas (PVcase): It’s pretty simple. We are taking data from Google Earth and importing height points with a resolution of 20 meters between those height points. When we launched that functionality, we gave a request to Google Earth, and then we imported heights, points, and topography which gave the accuracy and density between those points of 20 meters. However, one should consider that even Google sometimes can’t provide precise height accuracy. Its levels of accuracy differed over the years.
Question: Can we calculate the cut-and-fill quantity with PVcase Ground Mount?
Joseph Ziliukas (PVcase): Yes, definitely. It can be done in PVcase with accurate topographical data. One of the important metrics is the piling length you need to enter before calculating cut-and-fill. It’s important because the software will calculate all these values by creating the correct survey to make the correct pole lengths.
PVcase Ground Mount software will make your solar engineering tasks smoother and easier. If you are interested to try multiple features of PVcase Ground Mount tool, just schedule a demo.
Related
Case study on ground grading | PVcase
This case study compares terrain-following trackers (TFT) and traditional single-axis trackers (SAT) using PVcase software to analyze differences in site preparation, installation costs, and project timelines by designing TFT layouts that adapt to terrain profiles and evaluating the physical materials and work required for each tracker type on the same site.
How Valmont Solar Reduced Earthwork CAPEX by 46% with PVcase
Valmont Solar leveraged PVcase software to validate their single-string solar tracker design on steep, complex Brazilian terrain, resulting in a 10% reduction in earthwork volume, a 14% decrease in earthwork CAPEX impact, and a 30% improvement in feasibility assessment, ultimately achieving a 46% reduction in earthwork CAPEX compared to conventional multi-string tracker approaches.
PVcase vs PVsyst: Präzisionvergleich in der Ertragsprognose
Der Fachbericht vergleicht die Ertragsprognosemethoden von PVcase Yield und PVsyst, wobei PVcase mit 3D-basiertem Ray-Tracing, nativen digitalen Zwillingen und präziser Bifazialanalyse bei komplexem Gelände und Verlustvisualisierung durch räumliche Heatmaps eine genauere Standortmodellierung und Verlustberechnung ermöglicht, während PVsyst auf stündliche Verschattungsfaktoren, abstrahierte 3D-Modelle und tabellarische Verlustdiagramme setzt, wobei beide Tools Industriestandards für Modul- und Wechselrichterspezifikationen unterstützen.
2021: Year in Review
In 2021, PVcase significantly advanced its mission to streamline solar engineering by securing a record €20 million Series A funding in Europe, expanding its client base by 162%, increasing its team size by 115% with diverse international talent, launching the PVcase Academy for user education, enhancing its Help Center with multilingual guides, and introducing key software improvements like the ground grading feature to improve project efficiency.
The Importance of Topographic Data for PV Design
Topographic data is crucial for profitable PV design as it enables accurate 3D site mapping, slope assessment, and constraint identification, but challenges include the difficulty of accessing geolocated, usable data and managing large data sets, which tools like PVcase Prospect address by consolidating public and premium data to streamline land analysis and reduce time and costs.
The role of automated solar design software in solar project development
Automated solar design software significantly accelerates the traditionally labor-intensive and error-prone solar project development process by reducing design timelines from hours or days to minutes, enhancing precision, minimizing human error, and ultimately improving efficiency and profitability in the solar industry.